Author of the JP Weiscarver Mystery Series
To those who continually ask: “Yes, I am working on the next book.”
And, now, you have another chance to help with “The Reporter and the Apples.”
I’m accepting nominations for the name and short description of a police officer in Oldport, where the story is taking place. The character is a male, 25-35 years old. That’s it; everything else is wide open.
Send your nomination to me via personal message or email. You may also post it in the comment box below; I will not approve the comment so nobody else will see it.
This is a quick one that I may end as early as Sunday, so act now!
If I select your contribution, the reward is having your name included on the acknowledgments page of the book and a personalized and autographed copy of the paperback.
This is my sixth book in the series and each has had at least one character partially – or mostly – created by one of my readers. If you need inspiration, review the previous winning characters: Virgil “Moose” MacDuff in “The Reporter, a Ferret and a Hurricane”; Sandra “Sunny” DelSol in “The Reporter and the Penguin”; Gene Teller in “The Reporter and the Rose”; Matt “Matty” Davis in “The Reporter and the Sloth”; and Kat McFarlen and Lucas Funkhouser in “The Reporter and the Marmot.”
I’ve already held one name-the-character competition for this book, in fall 2017, which produced the winning entry of Jackson Carlisle.
Feel free to share this with your creative friends … if you’re not afraid of the competition.
As waves of white Americans drift nearer their old lives and further from the Black Lives Matter marches, some – maybe even many, hopefully most – are asking what they can do to continue supporting black lives.
Beyond that, lately, more people are talking about becoming “antiracist.” In other words, proclaiming racism as bad is fine, but what are you doing about it? I suspect there’s an uncountable number of ways we can do that, including the discomforting prospect of confronting racist or stereotypical remarks or jokes made by friends or family.
Then, just two days ago, I came across a 52-year-old story of a white man quietly standing up against racism on an international stage, standing beside blacks protesting injustice, standing in the face of the problems it would surely cause him.
The occasion was the medal ceremony following the 200-meter dash competition at the XIX Summer Olympics in Mexico City on Oct. 16, 1968. Anybody old enough to be aware of what was going on at that time will remember the images of two black American athletes – gold medalist Tommie Smith and bronze medalist John Carlos – standing on the award platform during the playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner,” shoeless, heads bowed, each extending black gloved fists into the air.
Yes, we heard much about it at the time and, in retrospect, I believe they accomplished much by elevating the discussion of racial intolerance. As they surely expected, their athletic careers ended at the same time.
But what about the second-place finisher? Don’t you remember him on the stand? They had all rotated 90 degrees to their right to face the flags during the national anthem, which positioned Australian Peter Norman in front of the other two, unable to see what transpired behind him.
Honestly, I had not given it thought before, but looking at the photo, one could easily think he had no part in the protest. But it did not escape people at the time that Norman was also wearing the same badge as Smith and Carlos, supporting the Olympic Project for Human Rights. He, too, paid a price, including being excluded from the 1972 Olympic team from his homeland, which was also facing its own racial discord over the treatment of the continent’s indigenous people.
Information about this story that is pertinent to our topic today is this:
Peter Norman was warned by Smith and Carlos only minutes before the ceremony. He gave them his support because he believed it was right and because he found it to be consistent with his Christian believes. He then asked them for a badge and they obtained one from another athlete. Lastly, though he paid a price, he spent the rest of his life proclaiming it was worth it to do the right thing.
I encourage you to learn more about this example of antiracism and present two suggestions. (1) A fine article, “The White Man in That Photo.” (2) A two-hour documentary, “Salute,” a compilation of interviews and coverage of the protest and the following decades for the three athletes. Find its online site here, its page on imdb.com here and it’s currently streaming free for Prime video members here. As a bonus to track fans, the film’s analysis and video of one of the Olympics’ great races is magnificent.
The general election is 140 days away. Plan to vote early, if your state allows it, to avoid the crowds and any last-minute problems. If we’re still dealing with the coronavirus, vote by mail if you can. We need to elect women and men willing to give more than lip service to treating everyone as equals.
The time has come. My plan was to hold off until a bit later, probably late July, but things have changed, racing rapidly and in multiple directions.
During last Sunday’s online sermon, our pastor pushed me into moving up my schedule.
“Silence is no longer an option,” he said, slowly and clearly. “Now, I have said many times, ‘Preach the Gospel always and, when necessary, use words.’ Well, now, it is necessary to use words because this nation is suffering because of a racism problem.”
I’ve said this here before, how as they integrated our school when I was in the sixth grade (1966), I felt certain my generation would be the last to experience racism. Ah, the naivety of the young … white … male.
It has not happened. Racism has not been obliterated. Some of it has changed. But it has not improved. As my pastor said half a dozen times, America has a racism problem. And it’s not limited to the major events that have recently thrust it into the limelight.
Said he: “… this nation is suffering because of a racism problem. And it’s the kind of insidious racism that has pushed people down for generations, pushing people down so hard that they are seen as ‘less than.’ They are treated as less than. People don’t have access to health care, they don’t have access to opportunity, they don’t even have access to equal pay or any kind of equal treatment. Things need to change and it needs to start now.”
I’ve been called out and I must respond. I must respond the way I know how. With the written word, expressing what is on my heart.
On July 29, 2018, I started a 100-day countdown to the midterm elections. Most days, I encouraged people to register and I implored them to turn out and vote.
The previous midterm election – 2014 – only 36.7 percent of the eligible voter population cast a ballot, the lowest percentage since 1942. Then, in 2018, after almost two years of the Trump administration, the Blue Wave brought forth a turnout of 50.0 percent. That’s still not outstanding, but it was the highest since 1912 – 102 years! (Statistics)
So, today, I guess I’m starting a 145-day countdown to the Nov. 3 general election.
You see, it’s not simply about confronting racism. It’s also about removing from elected office the people who not only ignore the problems but, in far too many cases, actually encourage them, ignore them, even instigate them.
And, in addition to our nation’s racism problem, we need to start making headway on fixing so many issues, so many and so diverse that it’s ridiculous to even try to list them here. We have 144 more days remaining.
For the first of a hundred times or more over the next 21 weeks: Register to vote. Vote early. Take a friend.
Our new endeavor, traveling and chasing dreams, is now fully under way, in spite of quarantines. The associated book and e-books are published and we’re looking forward to hearing from others who are chasing their wishes. We’d love it if you would follow Dream Chasing 101 with us.
The origin of Dream Chasing 101 must be credited to the dozens, likely hundreds, of friends and strangers over the years who have bombarded us with questions and statements of disbelief that such a lifestyle was practical and achievable.
Some months ago, we decided to publish a series of booklets about pursuing one’s dreams. Since our knowledge is built around chasing our own wishes, that takes the central storyline. However, it is our hope that others who may be hesitant about pushing forward for what they want will find some inspiration, maybe even some direction, within our experiences.
Without further ado, the booklets are now available. Get the details on the booklet page here.
View original post 50 more words
Twenty-five years ago today – at 9:02 a.m. Central time, April 19, 1995 – at least 168 people were killed, more than 680 injured, the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was reduced to half a shell, and 324 other buildings were destroyed or damaged by what remains the deadliest incident of domestic terrorism in the history of the United States.
Everyone living in the country at the time who was aware of current events will remember some aspect of what happened.
I turned Friday afternoon, via Facebook messages, to journalist friends of mine, many of them former co-workers, and asked them to share any memories, stories and feelings they’ve harbored these past 25 years. I gave them short notice and asked them to dig inside an area of themselves where some may remain reluctant to tread. Following are the first four, along with some of my thoughts, and I will add additional posts if others contribute over the next few days.
“You know what they say,” my wife offered the other day, “either lead, follow or get out of the way.”
That put into perspective for me this uncomfortable place we’ve been in recently.
With past challenges, Leah and/or I often had a role in the response. At least, we stood ready to help somehow.
Like a hand-printed sign I saw in a New York City photo that offered shopping and errand-running assistance to elderly neighbors and those with compromised health issues.
It hit us early as this COVID-19 threat materialized: We’re the ones other people are protecting.
Leah was diagnosed several years ago with autoimmune hepatitis. Just a few decades ago, that was a death sentence, but a treatment was discovered and, as long as she’s on it, she should lead a pretty normal life. However, her system would be a soft target for this coronavirus.
At 65, I’m officially considered at a higher risk. I don’t really feel it, but I respect the warning. Regardless, if I catch it, I will simply carry it home to my wife.
So, for this crisis, we’re not leading and we’re not following.
We’re getting out of the way.
Thanks to those who are keeping essential operations going. Thanks to those who, if they are able, actually stay home and help limit the spread.
Leah and I are starting something new, a Website and a series of guides geared toward helping people discover the options they have for filling out their lives.
Check out Dream Chasing 101 at this link. Follow the page and/or its social media and get in on the ground floor.
When life gives you lemons … at least try to learn something from the experience, especially if said lemon shipment comes with a large side order of sitting around time. Without further ado, and with the assistance of online friends where noted, here is an early draft of “Things we’re learning from our coronavirus experiences”:
* Just how long 20 seconds can seem.
* That movie plot lines of politicians ignoring scientists and putting entire populations in jeopardy are … well … not all that far-fetched.
* How to plant a victory garden, as well as deciding if neighbors will protest against chickens in the backyard. (contributed by Ryan E)
Are you scared yet? Angry? Motivated? Tired?
Are you convinced yet this threat deserves your attention, your cooperation, your oh-so-minor sacrifice?
Even those who only believe what they hear from Donald Trump now have something to cause them concern.
It’s simple, really. The president was first predicting COVID-19 deaths that could be counted on your fingers. Then that it would be back to business by Easter. Yesterday, however, he conceded he had been wrong, that 100,000 to 200,000 coronavirus deaths are likely. Multiple times, he mentioned that worst-case scenarios predict as many as 2 million deaths. 2,000,000 people. Dead. In the United States.
Did that get your attention? Are you ready to protect yourself and others?
Let’s do this
The fix – the only fix available to us now – is to break the chain.
The disease is easily passed from person to person. The answer is to not encounter the virus in the first place. Since you cannot tell who might be carrying it, that means you do not interact with other people, or, when it’s necessary, you do so with both parties taking precautions.
“What?” some have screamed. “You want me to stay inside for weeks? Maybe months?”
Possibly, but you can do it.
In the movie “Blast from the Past,” Brendan Fraser’s family spent more than 35 years living in an underground bunker. In “Cast Away,” Tom Hanks spent four years all alone on a deserted island. In “The Martian,” Matt Damon spent more than a year and a half alone on Mars.
And you’re fussing because you’re being asked to spend a few weeks in your home, watching TV and surfing the Internet?
How do you do this? You just do.
The same way you get up and go to work even when you really, really, really don’t want to. The same way you visit your in-laws and just keep your mouth shut. The same way you let your husband scream at a sports event on TV.
You just do it.
To increase the odds you do not get sick. Maybe die. To protect your family and neighbors.
At 65 years old, I’m considered a high-risk target, even though I’m in pretty good health. My wife appears healthier than me except she has an autoimmune disease that – though it is well controlled right now – can make her much more vulnerable. Yeah, you probably have no idea how many people close to you are more susceptible to such a disease than you thought.
So, for them if not for yourself, rein in your expectations for an exciting life just for a few weeks.
Stay at home. Maintain social distancing if you absolutely must go out. Practice good hygiene by washing your hands.
Finally, do what you can to not lose control.
Read, watch television, play on the Web. If you’re lonely, call up someone to talk with. Hit up your social media messenger or text to exchange greetings and information with someone, particularly a person who you think might be lonely.
Just do it.
If we all committed ourselves into personal lockdowns, maybe we could keep that death toll below 100,000. If we don’t, then a million-plus body count is certainly possible.
Spread the word. Challenge your friends to help keep the death toll down. Shame them, if necessary, into staying as isolated as you. Whatever it takes.
“Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to chill.”
For many of us, that is how we can best help the nation ride out the coronavirus. As an Internet statement goes: “Your grandparents were called to war. You’re being called to sit on your couch. You can do this.”
But that doesn’t mean it must be as boring as it sounds. Let’s think this through. How can we pass the time less painfully?
I’m often on the computer, either writing or surfing the Web. That’s a pretty normal day for me.
Leah is working on a quilting project she wants to finish while we’re in isolation.
Our RV park is in the country and we’ve been getting out for walks two or three times a day either around the park or down the county road.
Leah’s just finished streaming a bunch of episodes of the TV series, “Highlander.” Along the way, I picked up far more information about immortals than I thought possible. So, add binge-watching to the list.
We’ve both done a bit of telephoning or writing or online chatting with various friends.
We’re missing out on a cruise in order to be able to chill on our couch. To make up for it just a teeny-tiny bit, we’re planning to pick a night that we would have been at sea to dress up and have our own dance.
Help out here; we’re all in this together, even though we’re staying apart. What are you doing to make it easier to camp out on the sofa without the benefit of March Madness? Any other ideas you haven’t tried yet or are maybe hesitant to try?
Share your thoughts, while maintaining a more-than-safe distance from others, and let’s flatten this curve and regain a grasp of normalcy … however long it takes.
Finally, that opening sentence – “Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to chill.” – isn’t really the option it sounds to be. It’s an order. It’s what you must be willing to do for yourself, family, friends, neighbors and even total strangers.
Chill. Am I right?
You’ve not heard anything about washing hands recently, have you?
It’s everywhere. News. Talk shows. Politicians. Parents. The past two Sundays, our preacher has admonished everyone to properly wash their hands.
It may seem like they’re overdoing it, but washing hands thoroughly with soap and water, as well as abstaining from touching your mouth/nose/throat area with unclean hands, can be beneficial in keeping illness at bay.
Illness, you know, like the coronavirus covid-19.
My daughter and her family are spending spring break at Walt Disney World where, as you know, large crowds tend to congregate. She reports that people have been taking it in stride, giving others a decent amount of social space and exhibiting patience. She said folks seem to be taking the hand washing and disinfecting to heart. Additionally, employees have been wiping down surfaces at a fast pace.
But, did we really need such a heavy-handed campaign just to remind us to wash our hands?
Yes, we did. This is something I’ve never written about (best I recall) in thousands of newspaper columns and Internet blog posts, but…
Too many men and boys do not wash their hands before leaving public rest rooms. Other guys reading this can confirm it.
Tell me, women, what have you observed?
More than once, half-jokingly, I’ve told Leah in a store, “See the guy in the blue shirt? Don’t shake his hand.”
And it’s not just riffraff.
Don’t ask me any questions about what I’m about to say because I won’t answer them, but there was a guy at a place I used to work who I noticed never washed his hands. This fellow was pretty important in the company, a community leader type.
And he did not wash his hands upon leaving the rest room.
So, maybe that’s what we’ll take away from this virus scare. Maybe we’ll learn to wash our hands.
While we’re counting down to our next cruise, world health officials are counting the reasons we should not go.
“May you live in interesting times,” I’ve often heard said, is a traditional Chinese curse. The thought, whether originating in Asia or not, is that times are made more “interesting” when they are filled with strife and trouble; peaceful times are boring.
I refuse to allow discord to co-opt one of my favorite positive words – interesting – because we like to think we live interesting lives.
Currently, however …
View original post 375 more words
Many of you followed Leah and me for five weeks from May-June 2016 as we walked end-to-end, from Buffalo to Albany, on the Erie Canal in upstate New York.
It remains the overall neatest thing we’ve ever done.
If you did not follow along then, or if you need something to pass time on a bad weather day, I have revamped the blog into a single document, changing it to chronological order, and included a bunch of photos.
You will find it under the Expedition tab or by following this link.
Looking forward to the new year, I hereby resolve: If we fail to remove Trump from the White House, if we do not substantially replace Republicans who have abetted or at least turned blind eyes to an attempted authoritarian overthrow of our republic, it will not be due to a lack of effort on my part.
Yes, for the first time in quite a while – indeed, I cannot remember the last time – I’m making a New Year’s resolution.
How will I fight to save our nation from the ultra-conservative onslaught?
Promote voter registration and participation.
Be less quiet and amplify other voices.
Continue to care. About the persecution of people fleeing persecution. About violating religious freedom. About the oppression of people just because of who they love. About torturing our planet and threatening its ability to sustain life. About reserving health care for people who have money. About suppressing women. About turning a blind eye to slavery. About funneling the vast majority of finances to a disgustingly small number of people. About ignoring much of the rest of civilization because some Americans think they alone deserve all the breaks. There is so much.
Let’s make it a happy new year.
I read and hear it quite a bit, someone espousing hatred for Donald Trump.
I cannot hate Trump, flawed as he may be, because that helps nobody. It does nothing to alleviate suffering caused by his policies, it fails to improve international relations, it does not move us any nearer healing the planet.
Hatred doesn’t even affect him, at least not in any way beneficial. Granted, video from the World Series game where he was roundly booed by the crowd appeared as though he may have been hurt, but don’t expect that to change anything. This is not a holiday movie.
(As a side note, I have no problem with booing the president. It’s the only way most of us can vocally express an opinion of a celebrity or a politician, the opposite of cheering.)
The only person affected by hate is the one harboring it. Resisters have more to accomplish after last year’s ringing endorsement of Democrats in the congressional elections. Losing mojo by concentrating on hatred hurts us and our message.
So, I’m settling in on a one-year mission to do what I can to encourage new voters to get involved in the 2020 elections, to help us all by voting out Trump and the Republican Party that has failed to protect us from an aspiring dictator.
Instead of hating, body shaming, making fun of hair or bottled tans … whatever … there are plenty of genuine nation-killing problems on which to focus.
Check and make sure you’re registered to vote (some states have been dropping thousands off voter rolls) and study up on what’s happening.
Finally, one last-minute reminder. Some areas have elections tomorrow, Tuesday, Nov. 5. If that applies to you and you haven’t voted, do your homework and be there in the morning.
Today marks the fifth anniversary of the suicide death of comedian/actor Robin Williams.
As a live entertainer, Robin hardly had a peer. As an actor, he brought out the depths of an amazingly broad assortment of characters. Not all the roles he took were particularly noteworthy, but he seemed to relish the chance to do something bold, something different.
All his laughter and his apparent love for us made it difficult to understand him taking his own life, but then we heard about his growing battle with Lewy body dementia and it became understandable, sadly understandable.
Having lost a loved one to a long, drawn-out experience with Lewy body dementia, I can understand his decision, even though I could not encourage it. Could I, myself, consider it?
I honestly do not know.
I do not readily get caught up in the presence or absence of a particular performer, but Robin Williams will always strike a chord with me.
I miss him, I appreciate how he enriched our lives, I regret illness took him away so soon.
“You’re only given a little spark of madness,” he’s quoted as saying. “You mustn’t lose it.”
Thank you, Robin, for showing us the wonderful worlds of madness.
July 20, 1969 – 50 years ago today – is one of my most vivid milestone moments.
I remember some events so clearly and the dates readily spring to memory. Proposing to Leah. The birth of our daughter. Accepting Christ.
But the runaway leader for events that did not really involve me was doubtlessly July 20, 1969, watching humans place the first footprints on the moon. (I watched with my Dad at his grocery store, which I recounted here four years ago.)
It was a notable achievement, for sure, completing President John F. Kennedy’s charge less than seven years earlier, but it was important to our nation’s spirit for other reasons.
We were a country in turmoil.
Almost 17,000 American servicemen died in Vietnam in 1968, the peak, and more than 11,000 more in 1969.
Protests of the unpopular war were rampant, quite notably the Nov. 15, 1969, demonstration in Washington, D.C., that drew as many as half a million people.
The nation continued dragging its feet when it came to civil rights. The Rev. Martin Luther King was assassinated the previous year. That we were divided into two not-really-equal populations was painfully obvious, even to a young white teen.
Hurricane Camille, one of the most intense tropical cyclones to hit the United States, made landfall in Mississippi on Aug. 18, devastating much of the Gulf Coast and killing 259.
On June 28, New York City police raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay nightclub, providing what is considered the spark initiating the gay liberation movement in the United States.
The Charles Manson cult committed numerous murders and atrocities that captured the nation’s attention.
The day before the moon landing, a car driven by U.S. Sen. Ted Kennedy crashed on Chappaquiddick Island in Massachusetts, killing Mary Jo Kopechne.
The Beatles released Abbey Road, their final studio collaboration, and gave their last concert.
Then, at 9:56 p.m. Central time on Sunday, July 20, 1969, astronaut Neil Armstrong haltingly uttered as he stepped off the lunar module onto the moon’s surface, “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.”
The nation – indeed, the world – reveled in the accomplishment.
Turmoil and chaos embroil our country again in 2019.
We’re caught up in ongoing wars where we cannot see a point.
Our government has chosen to deny refugee rights to thousands fleeing persecution and has, in the face of withering criticism from countries around the globe, executed nationalistic plans that separate families, even children, and places them in prisons in an obvious effort to discourage others from seeking a better, safer life.
Civil rights remain an elusive goal as more and more stories surface of those in power denying rights to minorities, even to death.
Indeed, officials at the very top of government regularly incite racist behavior by appealing to the lowest, baseless fears of their constituents.
Global climate change continues to show itself in new ways, pushing weather to extremes and changing our future. To greatly exacerbate the problem, too many of our leaders choose to believe con-men rather than scientists.
Over the past 20 years, mass shootings in schools and houses of worship have become almost commonplace.
Personal wealth in our country has percolated to the top, enriching the rich while marooning low and middle classes in hopelessness.
Suicides and opioid addictions are wreaking havoc on American families.
Our LGBTQ communities, after winning rights and acceptance on many levels, are again being marginalized and punished for being different from those in power.
What is our moon landing now?
While waiting for tonight’s Round Two of the Democratic debates, here’s a look at a fun list developing on Twitter. A few are hash tagged, #WarrenGetsIt. (Disclosure: I have not yet picked a candidate, but Elizabeth Warren is on the short list.)
The first may have been the genesis of the tweets:
@MerrillBarr: Elizabeth Warren has never asked a bartender “what whiskeys do you have?” She’s already checked the shelf.
@PaulaInTulsaOK: Elizabeth Warren always tips at least 25% and never tries to get dinner at the lunch price.
@elizabeth_case: Elizabeth Warren never checks her phone when you’re having a heart-to-heart. It can wait.
@CCoceans311: Elizabeth Warren will let you use her charger. Her phone is at 100%.
@JoeyWesthead: Elizabeth Warren always lets you into traffic with a smile and wave! And – She never takes up 2 parking spaces or parks wonky so you have to crawl into your car/truck when leaving.
@MamalehC: Elizabeth Warren does the surveys at the bottom of the receipt because she cares about the working class!
@Mikestweeting: Elizabeth Warren ALWAYS uses her turn signal, even when it’s late and no one else is around.
@TootsieF: Elizabeth Warren does a little half jog when crossing the street so she doesn’t hold up traffic.
@amberahumphrey: When Elizabeth Warren gives you a ride home she always waits until you flash the porch light before driving off.
@AlishaGrauso: Elizabeth Warren always knows exactly what she wants when she gets to the front of the Starbucks line and never holds everyone else up.
@AuntieTeyTey: Elizabeth Warren always returns her shopping cart before getting in her car and driving away. (She wouldn’t dream of leaving a cart in a parking space.)
@drainladyspeaks: Elizabeth Warren washes her dishes right after she finishes eating, then washes your dishes that you left in there to soak.
@GeenuhFjord: When Elizabeth Warren gives a gift bag, she makes sure it’s not too event specific because she wants you to be able to re-use it.
@realTomChapmans: Elizabeth Warren always rinses out her recyclables before putting them in the bin.
@schristineyoung: Elizabeth Warren always stands to the correct side on an escalator. She understands people have things to do.
@vintagebaby1929: Elizabeth Warren never makes the joke, “so it’s free?” when things don’t properly scan at the register. She knows what’s up.
@tracyjust: Elizabeth Warren stacks all the empty plates and neatly places the silver wear on top at a restaurant.
There are many more; look them up. But, finally, just in case you’re thinking, “Hey, aren’t these a lot like …”
@DavidGillaspie: Elizabeth Warren is coaching Chuck Norris through a difficult time.
As mentioned earlier, Leah and I spent the month of March in the small town of Chapala in central Mexico.
I’ve finally finished an Expedition page telling about our visit with some 20 photos. Go straight to that page by clicking this link.
UPDATE: As of early Friday morning, there were 40 people killed by guns in the United States on Wednesday. These numbers, by the way, come from www.gunviolencearchive.org. It is also worth noting they do not count suicides, with the exceptions of suicides related to other shootings and “suicide by cop.”
Let’s run through them alphabetically.
I’m not real crazy about Joe Biden becoming the next president even though his eight years in the right seat while President Barack Obama piloted the nation are important. Plus, he works well with people, Congress and other world leaders. But there are the Anita Hill testimony and other issues. Many consider his centrist leanings a positive, but I’m hoping we can build on the overwhelming progressive results of 2018 to restore and expand policies protecting people, rights and the planet. Lastly, I desire to take a break from old, white males in the White House and he’s all three. However, I will whole-heartedly support Joe Biden if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Donald Trump or Mike Pence.
Cory Booker is hard not to like. He’s incredibly well-educated and an accomplished orator, a welcomed relief from our current situation. He’s a young, black male, but his relationship with the pharmaceutical industry is worrisome what with the huge job needed to fix healthcare. However, I will whole-heartedly support Cory Booker if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Pete Buttigieg, like Booker, is a Rhodes scholar, plus he served active duty as a Navy reservist in Afghanistan. He’s young, but some think he’s too young. If elected, he’ll celebrate his 39th birthday the day before his inauguration, almost four years younger than Teddy Roosevelt. Being a gay man gives him a chance to address more directly some of our nation’s issues. Would it hurt him in the general election? Maybe, but let’s be honest, just about anyone who would vote against him solely because he’s gay is probably a hate-filled version of die-hard Republican anyway. His greatest shortcoming, in my estimation, is his limited experience. However, I will whole-heartedly support Pete Buttigieg if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Julian Castro supplements his mayoral experience with his time in Obama’s Cabinet as secretary of Housing and Urban Development. I do like his early emphasis on healthcare and immigration reform. A young Latino, he may have crested early in the public eye as he’s been out of office now for a couple of years. However, I will whole-heartedly support Julian Castro if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
John Delaney is a white male who can only be considered “young” by presidential standards, but I must respect his dedication to his campaign. As a congressman from Maryland, he announced his intentions to run for president in July 2017 and opted to not run for re-election to the House in 2018 in order to concentrate on the 2020 election. His biggest problem may be that most voters still have not heard of him. However, I will whole-heartedly support John Delaney if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Remember what I said about not wanting to elect another old, white male? Tulsi Gabbard is the first in our alphabetical list to satisfy all three, if you’re willing to grant that being born in American Samoa to a father of Samoan and European descent is non-white enough. OK, maybe that’s a stretch, but she is also the first Hindu in Congress, if one really values diversity. She’s currently a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard, with which she served in both Iraq and Kuwait. Her policies, though, are more problematic, particularly her early opposition to recognizing same-sex marriage, a position she has recently reversed. However, I will whole-heartedly support Tulsi Gabbard if she is the Democratic nominee, especially if she’s running against Trump or Pence.
Kirsten Gillibrand is an inspiring candidate, having taken a lead in the #MeToo movement and standing strong against the current administration. (See her “Brave Wins” announcement video, for example.) Now a liberal New York senator, she will have to explain conservative votes while a member of the House. However, I will whole-heartedly support Kirsten Gillibrand if she is the Democratic nominee, especially if she’s running against Trump or Pence.
It seems Kamala Harris has done an outstanding job laying the groundwork for a White House bid. This youngish, black woman is an amazing force when questioning people in the Senate. Smart, articulate and tough as nails, one source suggested the worst thing about her was that she’s from California, which is tough for many conservatives to swallow. I’ll refer you to my earlier comment about Pete Buttigieg. Some have said her prosecutorial record isn’t liberal enough. However, I will whole-heartedly support Kamala Harris if she is the Democratic nominee, especially if she’s running against Trump or Pence.
John Hickenlooper is our next old, white male candidate. He promotes himself as a moderate – excuse me, an “extreme moderate” – which seems to have been what Colorado needed. I’m not looking for another old guy to do the same old things. However, I will whole-heartedly support John Hickenlooper if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
This cannot be, in my view, a one-issue campaign, but Jay Inslee is putting his heart and soul into what many think is the nation’s, indeed the world’s, biggest issue. Yep, he’s all-in on fighting climate change. Of course, he’s also another old, white male. However, I will whole-heartedly support Jay Inslee if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Amy Klobuchar, in addition to effectively needling the current president, is a champion of healthcare reform. She’s another woman who has shone during congressional hearings. The most stinging negative has been that she drives her staff hard, sometimes to the point of it being demoralizing. However, I will whole-heartedly support Amy Klobuchar if she is the Democratic nominee, especially if she’s running against Trump or Pence.
Next is Wayne Messam, the first candidate I really know nothing about. He’s 44, the son of Jamaican immigrants and mayor of Miramar, Florida. He also played football for Florida State, something he may be better off not mentioning to a lot of people. However, I will whole-heartedly support Wayne Messam if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Similarly, we follow with Seth Moulton, a congressman from Massachusetts and an Iraq war veteran. He also helped lead a failed effort to deny Nancy Pelosi the House leadership, which may indicate a strong progressive streak but does put his judgment into question. However, I will whole-heartedly support Seth Moulton if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
I was heavily behind Beto O’Rourke when he ran for the Senate last year because Texas badly needs to remove the stain on our national conscience that is Ted Cruz. But believing he is ready for the Senate is not the same as believing he’s ready for the White House, though I am perfectly willing to be proven wrong. However, I will whole-heartedly support Beto O’Rourke if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Tim Ryan is another who’s never hit on my radar that much. He’s also another who has a past of not fully supporting progressive ideals. However, I will whole-heartedly support Tim Ryan if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Here’s a tough one. I supported Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primaries because I was hoping to build on the fragile foundation Barack Obama had been able to assemble. Bernie was ready to push the big-ticket items that would shape our future, such as healthcare for all and returning respectable tax rates to the ultra-wealthy and promoting education. With his loss, though, I felt from the beginning that he should stick to the Senate, actually join the Democratic Party, and mentor the amazing new faces in Congress. Need I mention that he, too, is an old, white male? However, I will whole-heartedly support Bernie Sanders if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Eric Swalwell, another young congressman, has gone about making a name for himself, especially in taking opposition to the current president, but I have a difficult time taking him too seriously yet. However, I will whole-heartedly support Eric Swalwell if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Elizabeth Warren’s progressive chops are well-established and her nevertheless-she-persisted moment was classic. While I totally empathize with her Cherokee heritage story, because it parallels my own, she should have handled it better. Also, she is an old, white female. However, I will whole-heartedly support Elizabeth Warren if she is the Democratic nominee, especially if she’s running against Trump or Pence.
Marianne Williamson is another old, white female, but one who brings no political experience. She seems to be focusing on the country having a moral and spiritual awakening. However, I will whole-heartedly support Marianne Williamson if she is the Democratic nominee, especially if she’s running against Trump or Pence.
Andrew Yang is another inexperienced candidate (even though I believe he’s the only one on this list who follows me on Twitter). It’s generally acknowledged his overriding mission is to introduce the idea of Universal Basic Income into the nation’s dialogue and thought processes. I’ve read a bit about UBI the last couple of years and it might make sense considering the changes technology will press upon the work force and economy unless one or more crazed world leader bombs us back to an agrarian society. But that alone does not a presidency make. However, I will whole-heartedly support Andrew Yang if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Update: Michael Bennet tossed his hat into the ring recently, bringing the count to 21. His impassioned takedown of Ted Cruz on the Senate floor early this year brought him a lot of attention, but he has a moderate background that might not fly well in this primary. However, I will whole-heartedly support Michael Bennet if he is the Democratic nominee, especially if he’s running against Trump or Pence.
Too many Democratic voters are displaying a tendency of insisting on backing only a perfect candidate. They say they will not support this or that candidate because of an earlier vote or action. Folks, such reasoning is why we are fearfully watching the current administration’s attempts to eliminate constitutional protections such as the balances of power.
Truthfully, there are candidates listed above that I think have absolutely no business being president. I trust Democrats to do a better job of filtering them out than Republicans did in 2016. But the fact is, any one of them will be an improvement over what we have now.
A final thought: I repeatedly inserted the vice president’s name in my pledge on purpose. I still fully expect things to play out to a point where Trump resigns in an effort to save himself and Pence steps in. Pence, in my estimation, is at least as evil as his boss but more dangerous because he knows better how to work the system. Also, of the Republicans who have fled because of the president, many will come back to support Pence.
It’s popularly stated, “Vote Blue, no matter who.” We must all adopt that attitude now. We need to hear out these 21 candidates, allow their messages to work into the system, maybe affecting other candidates’ positions. Those who are less electable will fall out as others strengthen. Democrats do not need to attack other Democrats; that’s a Trumpian move. Support your favorites and highlight why you do so. Let the system work.
Wholeheartedly support the Democratic nominee, even if he or she is not your favorite. Support and vote Blue, trusting time to eventually take care of your concerns. We cannot afford for you to sit this one out. We cannot afford you casting a “protest” third-party vote. And you will vote Trump or Pence only if you really want to see how this country will collapse under a dictatorial leadership.
It’s been quiet on this page the past month, but I want you to know there’s been a lot going on behind the scenes, things that will soon appear here.
At the risk of raising more questions than I answer (OK, that’s probably my actual intent), here are some points to be addressed and explained later.
* I secured an artist residency with a program in the small town of Chapala, located on Lake Chapala, a short distance south of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. Leah and I wrap up a four-week stay when we fly home early Saturday.
* We’ve met and made friends with some marvelous artists from the U.S., Canada and Great Britain.
* We’ve walked all over the town. In fact, since the taxi dropped us off March 2 and until another takes us to the city Friday afternoon, the only vehicles we’ve been in are local buses to make two trips to the neighboring town of Ajijic to visit a farmers’ market.
* Leah has greatly enhanced her Spanish skills and I’ve probably picked up a word or two.
* Our casita sits on the third floor overlooking a crazy intersection, providing hours of watching pedestrians, vehicles and horseback riders weaving in and out.
* There have been nice visits and interactions with local residents.
* The scenery of the lake is beautiful, dominated by a large flock of American white pelicans that are wrapping up their winter and heading north for the breeding season.
* The weather – as it is year-round, the literature says – has been perfect.
* As for the art portion, I came here with one certain goal – to get to know an area foreign to me well enough to use it to create a setting in a future book. That has been accomplished. My writing on book six of the JP Weiscarver Mystery Series has been at pretty much a stalemate for the past 30 months or so and I did not want to set myself up for failure by making that my goal. However, due in no small part to the encouragement of others here, I have made considerable headway on “The Reporter and the Apricot,” including figuring out that title won’t work.
That’s enough for now. Also coming will be photos. The only thing I forgot to bring with me was the cord to download my camera into my laptop. The photo above was one I took with my phone out of our casita’s kitchen window. This tanker truck came around often. The driver would cruise next to the median and the hose operator on top sprayed it with water. I’m not sure if it was more to water vegetation or to try to keep dust down during the dry season.
Lastly, if you have topics or questions you think I should address, send an email or private message or leave a comment below.
Before I wade into my guesses for tonight’s Oscars, a wee bit of background. I’m in no way qualified to do this except I enjoy films and have no problem speaking my mind. I truly hope you’ll pitch in with a comment (at the end of this article) with your thoughts and predictions.
Also, I’m doing this simply for fun. I’ve always regretted watching the Oscars and having seen only one or two of the top-rated movies. This year, I’ve seen all 13 movies represented in the top six categories – Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor and Actress, and Best Supporting Actor and Actress. I’ve also seen five of the other films with nominations further down the list. (By the way, I published a column a few days ago telling why I felt like some would not win, if you want to check that out.) Let’s go.
Best Supporting Actor
And the Oscar goes to Mahershala Ali, “Green Book.”
His portrayal of Dr. Don Shirley was locked in throughout the bulk of the movie, which is one shortcoming. We didn’t get to see the character change much.
Adam Driver in “BlacKkKlansman” was truly a supporting actor in that he in no way had the lead (which one could argue Ali did) but the story could not have progressed without him. Richard E. Grant in “Can You Ever Forgive Me?” turned in perhaps my favorite acting job in this category. Either one of these could easily pick up the gold statuette.
The roles of Sam Elliot in “A Star Is Born” and Sam Rockwell (last year’s winner) in “Vice” were not, in my opinion, enough to warrant a win. The 74-year-old Elliot, however, seems to have a lot of fan support and that is a real thing.
Best Supporting Actress
And the Oscar goes to Regina King, “If Beale Street Could Talk.”
Most of these categories are difficult this year … as we like them to be … but I actually changed my mind since I scrawled my choices down on paper a couple of days ago. “Beale Street” tells an important story, one that much of America does not see or understand, and the character of Sharon Rivers is the thread that binds it together.
Dropping from the lead on my list is Amy Adams in “Vice.” The strength of her Lynne Cheney character shaped the movie as, if we can trust the film, the real Lynne molded Dick Cheney.
Marina de Tavira in “Roma” and the two nominees from “The Favourite” – Rachel Weisz and Emma Stone – could, in true Academy Awards fashion, spring a surprise on this category, particularly since either of those movies could turn into a runaway locomotive on the stage.
And the Oscar goes to Rami Malek, “Bohemian Rhapsody.”
Speaking of runaway locomotives, that term could apply both to his steamroller performance and to his winning record at earlier awards presentations. I cannot comprehend the task of taking on such a bigger-than-life character as Freddie Mercury, but Malek handled it with aplomb.
Any other nominee could, however, make a case for a win.
Willem Dafoe turned in what amounted to almost a soliloquy for 111 minutes in “At Eternity’s Gate.” That is to say, he was constantly the central figure, fighting with himself and others to express the artistic vision captured within Vincent van Gogh.
Christian Bale made a miraculous physical transformation to play Dick Cheney in “Vice” and accomplished a solid performance atop the makeup.
Viggo Mortensen’s “Green Book” character, Tony Lip, is the fun role actors love to play. We got to see Tony grow a lot through the movie. And, to be clear, this is not Aragorn.
Bradley Cooper is also receiving a lot of public acclaim for Jack in “A Star Is Born,” deservedly so. His tragic tale is written on the lines of the character’s face.
And the Oscar goes to Glenn Close, “The Wife.”
This is the only major category that is not even close, in my mind. “The Wife” was the last of the nominees I was able to see and I went in with no strong leader, but Close’s commanding performance as Joan Castleman instantly won me over. I love it when an actor can say as much as she did without even using words.
Melissa McCarthy is probably my next pick for her role as Lee Israel in “Can You Ever Forgive Me?” It’s a complicated role, tastefully accented by McCarthy’s deft humor.
Olivia Colman in “The Favourite” and Lady Gaga in “A Star Is Born” certainly became their characters, both exhibiting considerable range and emotion.
Newcomer Yalitza Aparicio, playing the lead role in “Roma” in her first film, was amazing, considering that. I don’t see her grabbing an individual statuette, however, unless it’s coupled onto the aforementioned runaway train.
The Oscar goes to Alfonso Cuaron, “Roma.”
I feel less qualified in this among all six major categories. I’m going with Cuaron partly because of all the buzz, in addition to it being a great film.
Spike Lee, “BlacKkKlansman,” has been talked about a lot, but most of the comments have mentioned it more as a makeup award for better work he’s done in the past.
Yorgos Lanthimos, “The Favourite,” certainly spun up a grand tale and must be considered a favorite, as well.
Pawel Pawlikowski’s “Cold War,” being not in English and being nominated only in this category, allowed me to view it thinking about the director’s hand. Even I could see effective results that undoubtedly must be credited to him.
Last, and certainly not least, Adam McKay’s “Vice” has been in and out of my consideration for the award. The movie was an effectively woven story of multiple elements and places in time that never seemed to lose me. I think he’s a strong contender.
And the Oscar goes to “Bohemian Rhapsody,” Graham King, producer.
Remember the runaway trains in “Roma” and “The Favourite” and the fan-favored “A Star Is Born.” All deserving winners, but “Bohemian Rhapsody” is the movie that, as I exited the theater, had placed in me a burning desire to create something, to go out and win at something, to achieve what I want.
Plus, of course, I grew into adulthood loving the music of Queen.
“Black Panther” is grand. “BlacKkKlansman” is an entertaining story. “Green Book” was fun and informative. “Vice” spun a powerful image.
But “Bohemian Rhapsody” is my top movie.
In addition to these 13 movies, I’ve seen five others that are up for one or more awards. If I counted correctly, that leaves 19 I’ve not seen among the other categories, plus the 15 short film nominations, none of which I’ve seen.
That is to say, the following quick predictions are a mixture of what I’ve seen, heard, guess and wish.
Best Original Screenplay – “The Favourite.”
Best Adapted Screenplay – “If Beale Street Could Talk.”
Best Makeup & Hairstyling – “Vice.”
Best Costume Design – “Black Panther.”
Best Cinematography – “Cold War.”
Best Original Song – “A Star Is Born” for “Shallow.”
Best Original Score – “Black Panther.”
Best Documentary Feature – “RBG.”
Best Animated Feature – “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse.”
Best Foreign-Language Film – “Roma.”
Best Sound Mixing – “Bohemian Rhapsody.”
Best Sound Editing – “Bohemian Rhapsody.”
Best Production Design – “The Favourite.”
Best Visual Effects – “First Man.”
Best Film Editing – “Bohemian Rhapsody.”
Best Animated Short – Best Live-Action Short – Best Documentary Short – I know nothing about any of these nominees; we’ll just leave it there.
The names from the memorial segment most likely to draw an audible response from you and the Academy members: Penny Marshall, Burt Reynolds, Neil Simon, Tab Hunter and Stan Lee.
Over / under on the number of references to there not being a host and/or to Kevin Hart: 11.5.
Over / under on minutes run overtime: 7.5.
Number of times conservative viewers will yell during acceptance speeches: 10.
Let’s get together: I will be live-tweeting whatever crosses my mind during the Oscars (8 p.m. Eastern / 5 p.m. Pacific on ABC). Join me. My handle is @smartaindale and I’ll be using the hashtag #OscarsPalooza. We might even start during the red carpet.
Through a series of clicks on the computer this morning, I stumbled across an old column of mine, which, coincidentally, was published exactly eight years ago today on a now-abandoned site.
I titled it “We are family.” Initially, it was about the extended family of people who have worked in Antarctica, but I expanded that point to say, “Common bonds come in many forms.” You know, we share a lot in common with most people.
In today’s America, that seems less true. Or, perhaps, it’s that we now find ourselves emphasizing not what we have in common but what separates us.
That includes me, but I’m willing to defend my divisive nature of the past few years. I’m dropping and/or unfollowing friends because I cannot maintain relationships with people who support a president and a party who promote white supremacy, practice the objectification of women, persecute people of other religions while openly defiling the believes of the religion they claim to support … and so on.
It’s not just on my side. One of my best friends from the Ice, who was once one of the most vocal supporters of my writing, dropped me as a Facebook friend because he could not handle me pointing out truths such as those in the previous paragraph.
Are we doomed to widening chasms between people?
Quite possibly. In fact, I highly suspect those divisions will increase dramatically before we find ourselves coming together. No science or research behind that, just my feelings.
For example, I read something this morning on someone else’s Twitter account: “When I feel down about the direction this country is headed in, I remind myself that every generation is less conservative than the generation prior. We’ve made progress although it’s been painfully slow. Liberals are a flowing river. Moving water can slowly cut through rock…”
I sincerely believe the writer is correct, that more liberal philosophies will win out. That’s simple, really, because those values embrace people. Conservatives of recent years have done nothing but draw together in tighter, more restrictive, more hate-filled clusters.
So, the question is, are we still family?
I think so.
Consider how we, for the most part, banded together to help hurricane victims and those who suffered the wrath of California’s historic fires. When people are in trouble, most of us reach out regardless of differences in ethnicity, religion, even politics.
Will that continue to be the case, even as we’re growing further apart?
We are family
(Originally published Wednesday, February 23, 2011)
You have surely heard about the killer earthquake Tuesday in Christchurch, New Zealand. Media outlets in the U.S. have given the story some play over these first several hours, though that will likely die down rather quickly, particularly if things in Libya continue to deteriorate/accelerate.
I took more note of the quakes than some people for two reasons. One, I spent a few days tramping around the city four years ago and found it and its residents incredibly charming. On a more personal note, looking at the calendar, I knew there were likely members of the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) redeploying through Christchurch en route to vacations and homes as the summer season nears its end on the Ice.
Sure enough, it seems almost 400 were in New Zealand at the time and most of them would be in Christchurch. Rather quickly, information began flying between friends that so-and-so checked in and was OK, another couple had already left town in a rental car to visit other spots on the South Island, and so on.
Not wanting to insert myself into a tragic story and not really knowing how to explain my heightened interest, I initially refrained from posting anything. Then my Ice friend Atlas (who’s currently working in Iraq) relayed via Facebook a post by one of his friends that explained what I was feeling.
“The USAP is the ‘largest family’ that many of us have known,” he wrote. “We are all bonded through Antarctica – no matter if you have deployed or not, no matter if you are a full-timer or contract, NSF, PHI, etc. If you have been in 3 months or 35 years … We are family, and I’m hoping and praying for you all.”
That’s it, I thought. I’m more attuned because we have something in common. I served on the Ice only four months and that ended four years ago. However, the experience was such that I instantly have a link to others who have done the same.
Such links are not uncommon, however.
People feel tied to one another because they come from the same town, state or country, because they attended the same school. Anyone who served in the military can receive a knowing nod from another, even when separated by decades in service. Those who have served overseas in war zones have an even stronger brotherhood, I believe.
Common bonds come in many forms. An experienced parent comforts a new member of the order by offering encouragement and maybe a little advice. People who share similar health problems, from migraines to gout, instantly find a new level on which to communicate.
So far, I’ve heard of no USAP members among the dead or wounded, though it occurs to me I’m thinking the way we often do in times of trouble.
You know what I’m talking about. We hear of a disaster and think, “I hope nobody I know is involved.” It’s a natural reaction, I believe, but what does it mean? Is a victim less important if we don’t know him?
That’s not true, of course. We simply tend to protect our own feelings, knowing we’ll hurt more if we share a bond with a victim.
And then there’s the final, huge truth.
We do share bonds. With everyone. No matter our differences, we all have things in common.
We are family and we’re hoping and praying for you all.
Filled with confidence by my success picking Oscar winners last year, I’m pumping up my game this year.
I’ve already seen all eight Best Picture nominees and all but two films (which I’m planning on viewing this week) which will also give me a look at every nominated best actor, actress, supporting actor and actress, and director.
By Sunday, I’ll make and post here picks in each of these six categories, the movie or person I think will win, as well as my personal favorite, should it be different.
At the time of this writing, I’ve not seriously thought about which I’ll pick, instead allowing them to marinate a bit. However, I might be able to eliminate a few by running through the lists. Make notes as you go through these and then comment with your thoughts.
Best Supporting Actor
Sam Elliot, 74, seems to be well-loved and this is his first Oscar nomination, coming from “A Star Is Born.” That is to say, he may garner emotional support, but that’s the only way I can see him winning. Not due to any shortcomings on his part, but the role wasn’t worthy of a nomination.
Sam Rockwell is looking to repeat in this category, winning last year for “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.” That was the only pick from the top six that I missed (excusing one where I had not seen the movie), giving my nod to Woody Harrelson from the same flick. Not one to learn from my own mistakes, I’m tossing Rockwell aside again this year, not feeling his portrayal of George W. Bush in “Vice” is Oscar worthy.
Side note: I have nothing against people named Sam.
That leaves three in the running: Mahershala Ali, “Green Book”; Adam Driver, “BlacKkKlansman”; and Richard E. Grant, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?” Any of the three is deserving, but I’ll have it narrowed down before Sunday evening.
Best Supporting Actress
Of the 11 nominated movies I’ve seen so far, the only one I didn’t care for was “The Favourite,” and it has five nominations in the six categories I’m looking at here, including two – Emma Stone and Rachel Weisz – for supporting actress. I cannot knock their performances, but I can tell you right now neither will be my pick.
Remaining are Amy Adams, “Vice”; Marina de Tavira, “Roma”; and Regina King, “If Beale Street Could Talk.”
This is Bradley Cooper’s fourth acting nomination, something which surprised me. He’s still looking for a win, though, which I think will still be true come the 2020 Academy Awards.
Still in the running are Christian Bale in “Vice”; Willem Dafoe, “At Eternity’s Gate”; Rami Malek, “Bohemian Rhapsody”; and Viggo Mortensen, “Green Book.”
I’ve not yet seen “At Eternity’s Gate.
I’m not ready to dismiss any of the Best Actress nominees yet.
A practical mind says Yalitza Aparicio, “Roma,” cannot be a serious contender because this is the only role she’s ever played, but another could argue that such a performance without a meaty background must indicate her talent.
On the other hand, Glenn Close, “The Wife,” now has seven acting nominations without a win. I’ll tip my hand here: she’s currently my leader among this worthy group.
While I didn’t really like “The Favourite,” Olivia Colman’s performance of an emotionally challenged monarch was masterful. This is her first Oscars nomination.
I wasn’t expecting to be impressed by the acting of Lady Gaga, “A Star Is Born,” even though she’s an established performer. I was. This is her first acting nomination.
It would be easy to feel Melissa McCarthy, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?” deserves a nomination simply for breaking so well from her lifetime comedic work. That wouldn’t be fair because she flat out did an amazing job. This is her second Oscars nomination.
Here’s the second category where I’ve not yet seen them all. I’ll go ahead and drop Yorgos Lanthimos, “The Favourite,” from consideration, even though the film has received a lot of vocal support.
Left in the running are Alfonso Cuaron, “Roma”; Spike Lee, “BlacKkKlansman”; Adam McKay, “Vice”; and Pawel Pawlikowski, “Cold War.” I have not yet seen “Cold War.”
There are eight nominations this year, six of which are based on real people. The exceptions are “Black Panther” and “A Star Is Born,” though the performing arts world is full of stories bearing some resemblances to the latter.
But that’s not why I’m dropping these two.
“Black Panther” was a great movie I enjoyed immensely and it’s still in the running for my personal favorite, but I don’t believe the Academy will award best film to a movie derived from comic books.
As for “A Star Is Born,” I can’t give this trophy to something that’s been done so many times before. Roughly the same story, with the same title, was filmed in 1937, 1954 and 1976. Only the first one was nominated as Best Picture and it lost to “The Life of Emile Zola.”
It won’t surprise you I’m also willing to drop “The Favourite,” leaving five finalists: “BlacKkKlansman,” “Bohemian Rhapsody,” “Roma,” “Green Book” and “Vice.”
Leave a comment below telling me where I’ve already messed up by dropping out your favorite (even “The Favourite”). Also feel free to tell me who I should pick in any or all the categories. I’m at times incredibly impressionable.
If you’re not subscribing to this blog, enter your email address in the appropriate box near the top of the right column, click to be notified instantly when a new post goes up and you’ll be told as soon as it and future articles are published (and those are the only times you’ll get emails).
Just because you didn’t ask doesn’t mean you didn’t want to know my thoughts during Super Bowl LIII. The game, the commentary, the commercials, maybe even some comments from my wife. Well, you’re in luck.
Following are notes and observations made during the NFL championship game in Atlanta the evening of Feb. 3, 2019. While I made these notes live, they were not posted until immediately after the game.
A couple of things to begin with … I do not have a DVR, so there’s no going back to confirm an exact quote, but I’m pretty certain of the quote or its representation if I have it in “quote marks.” Other times, I will summarize.
Also, I may not be able to get all names. I may simply type #25 if I don’t catch or have time to look up his name.
Without further ado, it’s time for kickoff.
Impressive lineup of dignitaries for the coin flip. There is a definite attempt in the pregame and some commercials already to paint a picture of unity and cohesiveness.
Jim Nantz and Tony Romo working the booth.
Rams kick off to the Patriots, who begin on their own 39-yard line. Don’t worry, this won’t be a play-by-play, though Sony Michel opens with an impressive 13-yard run.
The third play from scrimmage and two players are already pushing each other.
And the Rams come up with an early turnover. The announcers are all excited with the possibility of having an exciting game. You can’t blame them; so many Super Bowl games have been rather boring.
First punt and I should let you know I’m a big special teams fan.
First commercial is for something called spiked seltzer. Have you heard of it? It was a cute commercial, but do you think it needed more explanation.
Serena Williams in a commercial lets us know women have the power. I’m all in; y’all take charge because I trust you more than I do men.
Tony Romo says a defensive back is playing “too safe” on a third-down play. Well, I bet he wouldn’t have had he known the play … or had the benefit of making that decision after the play.
First flag and the referee calls a (in my opinion) picky penalty that just so happens to move the Patriots out of a really bad situation. Just happenstance, I’m sure.
Jason Bateman makes an entertaining elevator operator in a Hyundai commercial. Turkish Airlines is pitching a film. Is there a url? Not sure. We flew Turkish once; it was a good transatlantic experience.
“Great coverage provided,” says Jim Nantz. A pet peeve of mine is how easily sports announcers toss out the term “great.” Second timeout by the Patriots – to avoid a delay flag – isn’t desireable with more than 21 minutes to play in the first half.
Leah liked the Olay commercial. Doritos is now hot … OK. Some pet commercial seems to be out of place. Sorry.
Did I mention special teams? Yeah, Patriots kicker Stephen Gostkowski hooks a short field goal attempt. So, that’s a turnover and a missed FG. This would be a great time for the Rams offense, with young QB Jared Goff, to step up and show they belong here.
Nance just points out Gostkowski has missed four field goals in the past three Super Bowls. That’s cold.
Tony Romo tells us his microphone went dead earlier … and nobody noticed. (Seriously, I like Tony Romo; I just wished he had been in a Super Bowl as a player.)
Fourth and 3 for the Rams at the Patriots 42. Punt team is out … will they fake it? Flag. Tony Romo has fun with the officials, who, after a lengthy discussion, decide to charge the Rams with delay of game.
Commercial for the Rock, Dwayne Johnson, in a new movie. Has the Rock ever played a bad guy? I’m not remembering it.
Exspenify is cool. Well, that’s what the commercial says to me.
We come back from the advertising break and there’s a lot of standing around. That indicates a scheduling issue or communications problem in Atlanta, I think.
“Give Wade Phillips credit,” Tony says of the Rams’ defensive coordinator. I’ve said before, Wade has the coolest Twitter handle around: sonofbum.
“He’s going to have to play good,” Tony says of a Rams running back. Look, I know everyone seems to do this, but is it too much to ask for, “He’s going to have to play well”?
OK, the T-Mobile was cute, but what does it really say?
Next is an Audi commercial about a near-death experience that had me laughing out loud.
Second and five from their own 11 for the Rams to start the second quarter. Are they ready? Uh, no … a five-yard false start penalty.
Bud Light … Game of Thrones … what was that, exactly?
It always amazes me the number of network commercials aired during these high-priced events. Does that mean they couldn’t sell them all?
Patriots try an end-around that the Rams sniff out. I like it when an offense slips in a bit of a gadget play; I love it when a well-disciplined defense negates it.
A chance for a reprieve for kicker Gostkowski. He barely slips a 42-yard field goal inside the left goal post. Patriots up 3-0.
Google tells us that every day the most translated words are friendly, helpful and loving. Nice touch.
I don’t like the new kickoff rules. I’ll say that now so I can repeat it if an onside kickoff situation presents itself later.
I think the Rams got a break on that in-bounds call on an 18-yard pass. Belichick didn’t challenge it. You know why? Because they burned two timeouts early in the game and didn’t want to risk losing the third one. Yeah, things like running out a play clock can come back to haunt you.
Full disclosure, though, the Patriots stopped them and forced a punt anyway.
T-Mobile’s the first advertiser – I think – to repeat a commercial. But, wait … they teamed up with Taco Bell. I believe that’s the second commercial that featured two companies. That’s a good plan when they’re so amazingly expensive.
Jim Nantz says, “There’s never been a punt returned for a touchdown in Super Bowl history” as the Patriots punt to the Rams. There’s still not.
It was just a so-so commercial for Planters until they cut to Charlie Sheen on a bench saying, “And people say that I’m nuts.”
Early MVP candidate: Julian Edelman of New England.
“Change up the usual” by Stella Artois. That’s cute.
“More than 12 men,” Tony says of a penalty on the Rams defense, “somewhere between 13 and 18.” OK, you got my interest. Why not replay that and point them out? Huh? OK? … Crickets.
Rams defense steps up and stops Patriots on fourth-and-one. Seventy-three seconds left in the first half.
And Goff is sacked again. Punt on fourth-and-two.
The punt dies on the two-yard-line. Great kick. Pats should run out the last 16 seconds. And Brady takes a knee to send us toward the vaunted halftime show.
First, the Toyota Super Bowl Halftime Report. Is there anything they’ve not sold rights to yet? (Don’t answer; I know it will get worse.)
On the break leading up to the halftime show, the commercials are almost all for the network. Guess CBS knows everyone is running to the rest room.
The first comment during the halftime show produced two “greats.”
Nate Burleson predicts the Rams will take more shots down the field to Josh Reynolds. That gives me a chance to point out many of us, when our pro team doesn’t make the big game, look to see who from our favorite college team might be playing. I’m a Texas Aggie, which leaves me with only receiver Reynolds to watch. At the half, he has only one catch for 10 yards.
Winner!!!!! The NFL 100th season kickoff commercial was a treat for old fans. My favorite might have been Franco Harris making yet another immaculate reception. If you didn’t catch it (see what I did there?) then look it up.
OK, I’m taking a break during the show. I’m not a music critic, maybe because I can’t understand why Maroon 5 has seven members. Rest room break!
Back up three lines. It’s warm enough in central Texas that I pulled out a T-shirt after church. Since I don’t have any Rams gear, I chose my Texas A&M 12th man shirt. I don’t have any Dallas Cowboys gear, though I’ve been a fan of varying degrees since Don Meredith’s days. I won’t likely be supporting them again until Jerry Jones abandons the role of plantation foreman.
Patriots kick off to start the second half. Touchback.
Sideline reporter Evan Washburn tells us Bill Belichick thinks his team needs to do more on offense or something like that. Shocking, I know.
Patriots safety Patrick Chung walks off the field with his arm in an air cast. Anyone who has played the game, from high school on up, has stood on the field and watched another player being treated for an injury that could end his career. It’s a sobering moment, and then they go back to playing.
The announcers are building up Edelman. They’re already working on their MVP nominee.
Edelman suckered in Marcus Peters on that play … a big play.
It’s fun watching some of the assistant coaches along the sideline. Sometimes, I think they should wear skirts and carry megaphones.
T-Mobile is back … this time with Lyft. Some marketing genius going on here … maybe.
Verizon’s thanks to first responders is a series it’s been running recently. They have a good message and this one was particularly touching.
Luke Wilson and Colgate … well, that was a little discomforting.
Ohhhh. Almost a Rams TD.
Big sack by the Pats, then the Rams tie it up with a 53-yard field goal by Greg Zuerlein. Are we in for another exciting finish?
“They’ll call that every time,” Nantz says of a defensive holding penalty. Uh, Jim, are you familiar with what happened in the NFC championship game?
Wow. That’s the end of the third quarter already?
I looked this up for you before Jim and Tony bring it up. Super Bowl VII was the lowest-scoring Super Bowl game in NFL history. The Miami Dolphins defeated the Washington Redskins 14–7.
HEB, a regional commercial, ranks up with the best with a “Cast Away” spinoff.
“When everybody plays, we all win.” Microsoft weighs in on the welcomed theme of inclusivity.
Potentially a big penalty on the Patriots.
Burger King may have taken the weird ad lead with its #EatLikeAndy spot.
Budweiser touts brewing beer using wind energy. As if the radical right hadn’t had enough to get upset about with all the equality and diversification commercials, now they see that beer is taking a bend to the left.
Seven minutes left and we get our first touchdown; New England goes up 10-3.
Unrelated, I just opened my third beer of the game. That’s not much for some people, but that’s a full evening for me. By the way, it’s a stout named King Grackle brewed by Texas Beer Co., in Taylor.
A strangely entertaining spot from Amazon with capable support from Alexis.
Rams seem to be working their way back, but an unnecessarily desperate pass is picked off by the Pats at their own 4-yard line.
“Knowing keeps us free,” says The Washington Post in what serves also as a tribute to slain journalists.
Fourth and two inches. Hey, Bill, I’d go for it.
No way I’d kick. Too many things could go wrong, but it appears they are kicking. Gostkowski is good for a two-score lead. By the way, it again skirts in near the left goal post.
If nothing crazy happens, this will still be the lowest-scoring Super Bowl game of the first 53.
As a side note, I’ve probably eaten more Frito’s corn chips and bean dip than I should have. Luckily, like birthdays and Christmas, calories don’t count on Super Bowl Sunday.
I like Tony Romo’s thoughts on taking a Hail Mary pass early.
Greg Zuerlein comes out to attempt a 48-yard field goal and rely on the aforementioned sorry kickoff rules.
However, his kick is wide and it’s up to Tom Brady to take a knee and win Super Bowl LIII.
Good night, folks.
Last summer, we arrived at Mount Rushmore a few weeks before my designated job was open, so they put me to work in the parking lot.
Most of the time, I was partnered with Mita and Claudia, two students from Taiwan (many international workers, particularly those from Asia, adopt Anglo names to make it easier for us). I loved visiting with these two ladies.
I worked the crosswalk, sending RVs and other large vehicles to them to park. Periodically, one of them would relieve me for a break and they always insisted I take one. (I quickly convinced them I would not walk to the office for my break because that would mean climbing the hill again; they seemed to understand.)
One day, when Claudia ordered me to the shade for a rest, I said, “You take good care of me.”
“That’s because you’re old,” she said without missing a beat, “like my grandfather.”
Yep, I thought, at some 40 years her senior, that’s likely true. Frankly, I was pleased, even honored, by her words.
My wife commented this weekend about how most of the international students treat us. It’s with a level of respect – as elders – that we extended older folks when we were younger. Leah even pushed the point a bit further, suggesting that American youth don’t really do that anymore.
Is that true? I don’t want that to be true.
It’s been my practice, through the years, to hold the door or to yield way to people. Maybe they’re older. Maybe they’re limited in their mobility. No offense, but I grew up holding doors for women, even young women.
As I’ve reached senior status, I’ve been more willing to let a younger person extend me the same courtesy, not because I need it but to give them the opportunity to display respect for an elder.
Many do, for sure, but I’m afraid an even larger number do not. They will rush through the door in front of me, leaving it to shut in my face, or they’ll walk shoulder-to-shoulder-to-shoulder down a sidewalk, forcing us onto the grass.
It does me no physical or even emotional harm, though my physical needs might certainly change in the future, but it could be a barometer of the decline of respect.
Whether you’re young, old or in between, what do you see?
Spurred on by the incredibly successful Blue Wave … and obviously anxious to build upon it … the process of Democrats selecting the person they feel can best unseat Donald Trump if he’s still president in 2020 has begun.
Just like that.
We all have known to expect a high number of candidates. Early filings, announcements and teases are proving that out early.
What can I say? This should be entertaining.
Just for the fun of it, here’s a rundown of candidates and potential candidates as listed in Wikipedia. They’re divided into subsets, each of which is alphabetized.
Major declared candidates
Julian Castro, Texas, former HUD secretary and mayor of San Antonio.
John Delaney, six-year congressman from Maryland who did not run for re-election in order to focus on the presidential campaign.
Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii, just began fourth term in U.S. Congress, of which she was the body’s first Samoan-American and first Hindu member.
Richard Ojeda, West Virginia, retired major in the U.S. Army, state senator since 2016 who just resigned to concentrate on this election.
Other declared candidates
These have not previously been elected or appeared in polls but are otherwise notable.
Michael E. Arth, listed as artist and public policy analyst among other things, is from Florida but was born on a U.S. Army base in England to two U.S. citizens.
Harry Braun, from Georgia, is no stranger to presidential campaigns as he ran in 2004, 2012 and 2016.
Ken Nwadike Jr. may not sound familiar to you, but you might recognize him as the Free Hugs guy, he’s from Florida and is a motivational speaker and peace activist.
Robby Wells, from Georgia, is a former college football coach and ran for president the past two elections.
Andrew Yang, New York, an entrepreneur and founder of Venture for America.
There are almost 130 more who have filed.
Those with scheduled announcements
In other words, they’re not officially in yet (wink, wink).
Kamala Harris, a first-term U.S. senator, formerly attorney general of California, expected to announce next weekend.
Marianne Williamson, a spiritual teacher and activist from California.
Those who have announced they are exploring the idea of running, which usually means they’re running.
Jay Inslee, governor of the state of Washington since 2013 and previously a U.S. representative.
Elizabeth Warren, Massachusetts, senator since 2013.
These folks have expressed varying degrees of interest.
Michael Bennet, senator from Colorado.
Joe Biden, long-term U.S. senator and vice president to Barack Obama, from Delaware.
Michael Bloomberg, another billionaire from the Big Apple, but at least this one has political experience, serving as New York City’s mayor more than 10 years.
Cory Booker, just elected to second term as U.S. senator from New Jersey, previously mayor of Newark.
Sherrod Brown, senator and former representative from Ohio.
Steve Bullock, governor of Montana since 2013.
Pete Buttigieg, mayor of South Bend, Ind., since 2012.
Bob Casey Jr, senator from Pennsylvania since 2007.
Oscar De La Hoya, yes, the boxing champion from California.
Eric Garcetti, mayor of Los Angeles, California, since 2013.
Kirsten Gillibrand, senator from New York since 2009 and previously a representative.
John Hickenlooper, governor of Colorado and former mayor of Denver.
Eric Holder, U.S. attorney general from 2009-2015, from the District of Columbia.
Angelina Jolie, the actress and philanthropist from California.
Amy Klobuchar, senator from Minnesota since 2007.
Terry McAuliffe, governor of Virginia 2014-18.
Jeff Merkley, senator from Oregon since 2009.
Beto O’Rourke, representative from Texas 2013-19.
Tim Ryan, representative from Ohio since 2003.
Bernie Sanders, senator from Vermont since 2007, representative 1991-2007, and runner-up for the presidential nomination in 2016.
Eric Swalwell, representative from California since 2013.
One might say there is or has been a public swell of support for these folks to run, but they’re said nothing supporting or shooting down the idea.
Stacy Abrams, state representative in George 2007-2017 who made a close race for the governorship last election.
Andrew Gillum, mayor of Tallahassee 2014-18, who made a close race for the governorship of Florida last election.
Mitch Landrieu, mayor of New Orleans 2010-18.
William H. McRaven, retired U.S. Navy admiral, from North Carolina.
Joseph Sanberg, co-founder of Aspiration Inc., from California.
Adam Schiff, representative from California who’s proven to be a thorn in Trump’s Twitter side.
Howard Schultz, from Washington, former CEO of Starbucks.
More quickly, a look at speculative candidates who have publicly declined.
Michael Avenatti, who gained fame as Stormy Daniels’ attorney; former California Gov. Jerry Brown; the previous Democratic nominee, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; former FBI Director James Comey; North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper; New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo;
Jamie Dimon, finance executive; Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel; former Sen. Al Franken; former Vice President Al Gore; Luis Gutierrez, former representative; actor Tom Hanks; media executive Bob Iger; actor Dwayne Johnson; Sen. Tim Kaine;
Caroline Kennedy, former ambassador to Japan; Rep. Joe Kennedy III; former Secretary of State John Kerry; Rep. Seth Moulton; Sen. Chris Murphy, Gov. Phil Murphy; Gov. Gavin Newsom; Michelle Obama, former first lady; former Gov. Martin O’Malley;
former Gov. Deval Patrick; NBA coach Gregg Popovich; Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg; conservative talk show host and former Republican Rep. Joe Scarborough; philanthropist and activist Tom Steyer; Sen. Jon Tester; former state Sen. Nina Turner; Rep. Maxine Waters; television host Oprah Winfrey; and Facebook chairman Mark Zuckerberg.
A couple of months ago, while Leah and I were returning to Central Texas from South Dakota, we spent two weeks in the southern Texas Panhandle.
One neat thing we did was spend a day meditating on the plains of Caprock Canyons State Park.
It was a neat experience and I decided to do a little something about it for my expedition section.
I apologize. I meant to post notice here that I would be absent for a while and let you know where I am.
For a week now and on into the new year, I’m standing as a witness to a migrant children’s prison at Tornillo, Texas, outside El Paso.
I’ve set up a site to document what is happening. Find it at TornilloChristmas.com.
The photo above came from Guardian.com after Beto O’Rourke spoke to the gathering last Sunday. Yep, that’s me in the background livestreaming it.
Today’s a free holiday for many folks. By that, I mean we took care of the observances for Armistice Day / Veteran’s Day on Sunday … well, if it wasn’t raining too much … so, this Monday is truly a day off. (Yes, I know, like all holidays, many people work to keep the world turning.)
The Wi-Fi at our RV park is better than average, so I use it if I’m not streaming or doing something sensitive. Upon signing in, it automatically opens the msn.com home page. Many websites maintain such a landing site, featuring an assortment of headlines from numerous sources. Usually, I just close that tab or window and continue doing my thing.
But … today is a free holiday, so I started clicking. Let’s go surfing now.
Ask the Salty Waitress: Should I tip on the pre- or post-tax total? – The name of the column, “Ask the Salty Waitress,” should give you a good idea how she would answer the question. It’s a quick, fun read that ends with, “… and generally try not to be a cheapskate.”
25 Recipes No One Makes Anymore – But Should – OK, pet peeve time. Usually, when you see a headline containing “X Number of Whatever,” it’s going to be a slideshow, which means you have to click through each of the 25 or however many items one page at a time, driving up their click rate and draining your bandwidth. It must be incredibly interesting to me to do so. In this case, I clicked to the first frame, which featured cinnamon toast, and then closed the window. I will not mention any more stories that require you to click through multiple pages.
This Was the Price of Milk the Year You Were Born – The title is a little misleading in that it lists the price every five years, those ending in 0 or 5, dating back to 1930. In addition to seeing that a gallon of milk cost about 93 cents when I was born, the relatively short article talks about what influenced the price changes.
Here’s How Long It Takes Your Body to Reverse the Damage of Smoking – Allow me to cut the drama: 16 years. This study says it takes 16 years for smokers to reclaim their health. There’s more information in the article, if this applies to you.
13 Ways You’re Ruining Your Cell Phone without Realizing It – Of course, surfing means you’ll run across more links that send you another direction. This has tips for protecting your phone and, no, it’s not a slide show. Much of the advice concerns battery management.
We Never Got Flu Shots. Then the Flu Almost Killed My Husband – I don’t want to hear that you never get flu shots and never get sick, even if it’s true. Such statements discourage people who really should be protected. (And you getting the shot helps protect those who are unable to get one because of other health issues.) Just read this couple’s story.
This family of swans has learned to use pedestrian crossing on daily commute – The headline says it all. A 1-minute, 45-second video.
Tesla Owner Uses Autopilot to Avoid Parking Tickets – Another video, this one 45 seconds, but the headline is better than the video.
Underground Hotel Built Inside a Quarry Will Soon Open – Admit it, who hasn’t always wanted to stay in a hotel built mostly underground inside a Chinese quarry? Am I right? Reservations open soon at only $487 a night. Send me a postcard!
Want to feel your age? How’s this?
I was doling out headaches before there was “acetaminophen.” I’ve been causing a stink since before “refried beans.” Heck, I predated “decaf.” I’ve been around since before “certified mail.”
I know this thanks to a site provided by Merriam-Webster, the dictionary people, called Time Traveler.
What they’ve done is group, by year, what they call “first known use,” the earliest recorded use in English of the oldest sense of the word defined in the entry. For example, in the second paragraph, the noted words were dated, in order, 1958, 1957, 1956 and 1955.
I solicited volunteers through Facebook and came up with these:
Darsha’s parents were married in 1994. Debuting in usage that year were Botox, cybercafe, dot-com, LASIK, MP3, pole dancing, roofie, spoiler alert, spyware, task bar, webcam and wifebeater (for a man’s white tank top).
Tina was married in 1978. Entering the English lexicon that year were attention deficit disorder, bed and breakfast, bustier, chemical peel, control key, dramedy, face time, gimme cap, half-pipe, hepatitis C, improv, off-grid, pad thai, sticky note and Stockholm syndrome.
Vicki was born in 1960. Added to the things she was yet to learn were AC/DC, a-go-go, arcade game, brain drain, cockamamy, coin-op, dial-up, discotheque, Eurodollar, hardnose, hate crime, health spa, junk food, kook, lab coat, mayo, square one, theme park and valet parking.
Pick a date and dive in, but I warn you it could turn into a time suck (first used in 1991).
Oh, one other point. The dictionary is not limited to our life spans. Consider the words allied, bowler, bulldog, dexterity, laughingstock, opulent, reportable and trash.
Take a guess as to when they were first printed. Try 500 years ago … 1518. Wish them a “happy birthday” and they should understand as both of those words have been around since the 14th century.
Today is the U.S. congressional midterm election.
If you’ve not voted yet, do it now, but let’s assume everyone has voted or made plans to do so. Let us talk about life after the election.
Please tell us how your life will change tomorrow. Two answers are perfectly acceptable, since it may depend on the outcome of the elections.
If you promise to participate and will comment with your personal thoughts, plans and ideas, then I’ll go first.
At the time of the 2016 presidential election, two years ago, I was working on the sixth book in my JP Weiscarver Mystery Series. The fifth, “The Reporter and the Marmot,” was published the preceding July. I never have a rigid schedule, but I was easily on track to finish “The Reporter and the Apricot” (title subject to change) by spring 2017.
Following the election, though, I found it almost impossible to be creative or to stay focused on my writing. I felt a calling to use whatever talents I had to correct what I saw as a near-irredeemable mistake.
Two or three times, I pulled out the manuscript and started back to work, but it never lasted long. There was a name-the-character competition I completed a year ago, but I still haven’t introduced the character in the story. I just checked and the last time I saved any changes to the document was last January.
So, you guessed it, I’m planning to send my political commentary on a sabbatical (well … almost) and get to work on the book.
In my defense, it’s not that I’ve quit writing, just directed it from my novels. This post is my 81st during the 100-day countdown to the election. The Word document says it contains almost 28,000 words, enough in itself for a small book. Plus, there was much more in the 20 months or so leading up to the countdown.
With the election in our rearview mirror, I can return to writing blog posts about less pressing matters. For example, I want to tell you about several hours I recently spent over a two-day period in Caprock Canyons State Park, watching the world around me and listening to my thoughts.
There you have my plan for what to do after Democrats ride a Blue Wave to begin repairing the damage recently done to our country.
If that doesn’t happen today, if we have a replay of 2016 … I honestly have no idea what will happen next in my life.
Your turn. Scroll down to the comment section and tell us what you foresee happening with you.
Thanks to those who have followed along and contributed comments, likes and shares during the 100-day countdown. I can only hope we helped persuade some people to vote. At the least, when folks talk in later years about this era in our country’s history, we can say we tried to do something.
It is one day until Tuesday and the next U.S. congressional midterm election.
Election Day is tomorrow, which means early voting has ended in most states. If you’ve not voted yet, you must show up Tuesday and cast your vote. You’re down to your last chance. That means not walking away if there’s a long line, not going in unprepared, and not taking no for an answer.
Review the graphic above.
Know where you’re supposed to vote. It’s often not the same places where early voting was conducted. If you’ll be going after work, double-check the hours. Though 7 a.m.-7 p.m. is common, some differ. Carry a government-issued photo ID with you, more than one if you have them, even if your state doesn’t require it. Having one with a physical home address is preferable because it affects where you are eligible to vote.
If you get in line before the polls close, they are required to let you vote, even if it takes hours. Do not let them turn you away. If you have problems, ask for help. If that doesn’t fix things, call the Election Protection Hotline at 1-866-OUR-VOTE (1-866-687-8683).
If you are in line to vote when your polling place closes, and anyone tries to keep you from voting, you may also contact the Department of Justice Civil Rights Department by phone (1-800-253-3931), email (firstname.lastname@example.org), or submit a complaint on their website.
Finally, here’s some less technical advice.
Consider that you may be in line for a while. Carry a book or a well-charged cell phone. You’re also familiar with your bladder requirements; need I say more? Behave yourself. Don’t start talking politics. You might be tempted to persuade someone to your thinking, but don’t go there. If someone is challenging you, just refuse to participate.
Is there a friend or two who hasn’t voted? Ask them to accompany you; y’all can entertain each other and maybe even save spots during rest room runs.
With any luck, you won’t have to wait. Whenever you do vote, be sure and pat yourself on the back via social media and/or show off your “I Voted” sticker when you stop for an ice cream treat.
And, just in case you need to hear it again … Be sure to vote Tuesday.
It is two days until Tuesday and the next U.S. congressional midterm election.
Here’s a quick message for those members of the Blue Wave looking for a constructive, last-minute action they can take to help bring home a Democratic win.
Many of us have been living this struggle for weeks and months. Doing so can cloud one’s vision and lead to thinking everyone else is equally well-informed.
That’s not always true. So, here’s the idea I appropriated from someone else online.
Ask a compassionate friend, someone who tends to care about others, if he/she knows about the separation of families at the border and the incarceration of children, about Democratic plans to help more people afford medical care, about the Robert Mueller investigation, about Republicans’ stated plans to steal Social Security funds to pay off their tax scam, about Republicans ignoring the warning signs of global climate change … and so on.
If not, educate and then help your friend make a plan to vote Tuesday.
Finally, if you’ve not voted yet, make sure you do.
It is three days until Tuesday and the next U.S. congressional midterm election.
We’ve been talking the last couple of posts about who should vote for Democrats during this election. (Hint: it’s pretty much everybody.)
The best commentary on that point, as I mentioned at the close of yesterday’s post, is that many lifelong Republicans are crossing over – and encouraging others to follow – to vote for Democrats. Sometimes they’re talking about specific races; many times they’re mentioning voting Blue down the ballot. Many are bailing out on their party until it corrects its course; some are declaring they’ve changed parties … period.
This is what I’ve been waiting for. Optimistically, I expected it to begin much earlier in Trump’s presidency. Surely, it did, but there was no movement large enough to create a stir.
Now, perhaps emboldened and further enlightened by the Blue Wave, more are coming out, such as former Florida GOP Congressman David Jolly, who encouraged Republicans to vote for Democrat Andrew Gillum in the Florida governor’s race.
So, even if you’ve always voted Republican, you, too, should vote Blue. … Unless you’re an ultra-rich white male, in which case you can justify voting red.
It is four days until the next U.S. congressional midterm election.
Thinking about casting a “protest vote” this election? Maybe throw some support to a third party because you’re fed up with politics? Perhaps write in Mickey Mouse or Goofy?
Please, not now.
Believe me, I’m not against what you’re thinking about. In 1992, because I wasn’t excited about either George H.W. Bush or Bill Clinton, I cast my vote for H. Ross Perot. In 1980, I was one of only 5.7 million people to vote for John Anderson, my protest of the control two parties held on the system.
Alas, what we have is a two-party system. A third-party or independent candidate can occasionally win an election, but those are rare and already well known – Sens. Angus King and Bernie Sanders, for example.
So, why not now?
Things are different this year and likely will be again in 2020. There’s already a protest vote that’s gained incredible momentum and is positioned to accomplish something, maybe even achieve a lot. That is the Democratic Party, aka “The Blue Wave.”
As such, the tweet above rings true. A vote for any third-party candidate this election is essentially a vote for the Republican party and its maleficent leader because it weakens the wave.
Also, I’ve heard from many lifelong Republicans who have already voted with the Democrats this year. Some, surely, are trying to save their party by weeding out those who are destroying it. I’m fine with that; we need two capable parties. Y’all come over and help us save the country and maybe you can soon reclaim and reform the GOP and we can maybe soften the Blue Wave and the bulk of us can resume working together.
It is six days until the next U.S. congressional midterm election.
One thing I see repeated a lot these days is, “I cannot understand why any _____ supports Republicans,” with a wide assortment of people placed in the blank. That gave me the thought, as we’re only six sunrises removed from Election Day, to consider who seems to be a natural to support the progressive movement that is the Democratic Party.
It makes sense for the following citizens to vote Blue:
* Native Americans
* People who may require medical care
* People whose loved ones may require medical care
* Those who support the entire Constitution, not only the Second Amendment
* Gun owners who don’t mind being responsible gun owners
* Victims of assault
* Students and their supporters
* Young adults
* Folks depending on Social Security and Medicare
* People who are not wealthy
So, unless you’re an extremely wealthy white male, it makes no sense for you to vote Republican at this point in time.
Vote Blue. Vote early. Take a friend.
It is seven days until the next U.S. congressional midterm election.
Remember the Teapot Dome Scandal? If you’re like me, it’s one of those dark times in American government that we heard about in history class but happened a long time ago and … and … “I’m sorry, Coach, but I didn’t read the assignment.”
For a refresher, this History.com article explains it as “an unprecedented level of greed and corruption,” featuring “ornery oil tycoons, poker-playing politicians, illegal liquor sales, a murder-suicide, a womanizing president and a bagful of bribery cash.”
Now that we’ve gotten an idea of how embarrassingly horrible Teapot Dome was, let’s move to this New York Times article from Sunday, “Trump’s Corruption: The Definitive List,” which states, “Compiling the list made us understand why some historians believe Trump’s administration is the most corrupt since at least Warren Harding’s, of 1920s Teapot Dome fame.”
There’s an additional reason this article screamed out to me – besides pointing out how horrendous is this White House. Several weeks ago, I made a note from something I read claiming real Republicans were considerably bothered by the party’s “culture of corruption” and Trump’s use of the office for personal gain.
Is that true? I would love to hear that substantial numbers of Republicans have finally found something distasteful about what’s emanating from the Oval Office. So, let’s take a brief look at what the Times article says.
However, there is much too much information, so I’ll just list the themed categories and a bit from each. You really need to read the article. The first seven categories are grouped under the heading, “Trump and Family.”
Foreigners are paying the Trumps
“Officials from foreign governments have realized they can curry favor with Trump by spending money at his properties.”
Americans are paying the Trumps
“American officials and business leaders have also spent money at Trump properties, sometimes in an apparent effort to please the president.”
Trump Inc. is expanding overseas
A Trump-related project in Indonesia received a $500 million loan from a company owned by the Chinese government. The president responded by lifting sanctions on another business with close ties to the Chinese government.
Kushner Inc. is wooing foreign investment
Jared Kushner has exhibited to his father-in-law that he, too, is adept at trading political favors for sizeable investments from other governments.
The presidency has become a branding opportunity
His Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago, has doubled its membership rates.
Taxpayers are subsidizing the Trumps
While visiting or staying at one of his properties almost one of every three days, Trump is directing taxpayer money to his own business.
Trump Inc. gets special protection
The president personally axed a plan to move an FBI office and instead ordered building a new facility at the site, which would prevent a competitor hotel from challenging his for business.
The next six categories are under the heading, “Trump’s Cabinet, Aides and Allies.”
Friendly businesses also get special treatment
“More than 164 former lobbyists work in the administration, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, including several who regulate the industries that once paid their salaries.”
Family, friends and donors get perks
“The president and his aides have repeatedly shown they are willing to use the government’s prestige and power to help their friends and relatives make money.”
Cabinet officials make unethical stock trades
Some Trump officials appear to have made policy decisions benefiting the companies in which they owned stock.
Trump’s orbit receives cash
“Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, reportedly used his position to offer private briefings to a Russian oligarch to whom he owed millions of dollars.”
Cabinet officials take junkets
You might question the integrity of Trump’s Cabinet choices, but you’ve got to admit they love to travel on someone else’s dime.
Trump’s team enjoys interior decorating
Ryan Zinke, the interior secretary, spent $139,000 in taxpayer money on new doors for his office, for example.
The final, and most important, section is “Where is Congress?”
It has shirked its constitutional duty
“The biggest scandal of all, however, is not even the corruption of the Trump administration. It’s the inaction of Congress. … (T)he Republican leaders … have enabled the most corrupt administration of our lifetimes.”
And this is where a story about a corrupt president finds a role in an election where he’s not running.
To address the corruption, we need to change the leadership in Congress. We do that by electing as many Democrats as we can and insist they earn their keep.
Again, read the entire article for more details.
Early voting is ongoing in many places. Final voting takes place nationwide next Tuesday.
It is eight days until the next U.S. congressional midterm election.
It’s being said that young voters may not turn out. A recent Gallup poll said only 26 percent of potential voters aged 18-29 said they were “absolutely certain” they would vote.
In a way, it’s understandable. You may feel disassociated from the rancor of politics today. You could justifiably think the problems were created by the old folks … let them come up with solutions.
Do not forget, however, that problems such as rising healthcare costs and diminishing opportunities will someday soon land at your feet. You need to put your voice into play now.
It is not unprecedented that society leans on young adults. During the greatest global threat of all time, World War II, it is estimated the average age of U.S. soldiers was 26 years old. Many entered the service at 17-19. Young adults likely saved the world from being overrun by dictators.
So, yes, vote. Research the candidates, find those who best represent your beliefs and go vote.
Oh, and if you need any more incentive, the same survey found that 82 percent of those aged 65 and older were absolutely certain they will vote.
Vote early and vote with friends.